子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   题型   >  
本题由2提供

Manufacturers have to do more than build large manufacturing plants to realize economies of scale.

It is true that as the capacity of a manufacturing

operation rises, costs per unit of output fall as plant

size approaches “minimum efficient scale,” where the cost per unit of output reaches a minimum,

determined roughly by the state of existing technology and size of the potential market. However, minimum efficient scale cannot be fully realized unless a steady “throughput” (the flow of materials through a plant) is attained. The throughput needed to maintain the

optimal scale of production requires careful

coordination not only of the flow of goods through the production process, but also of the flow of input from suppliers and the flow of output to wholesalers and final consumers. If throughput falls below a critical point, unit costs rise sharply and profits disappear. A manufacturer’s fixed costs and “sunk costs” (original capital investment in the physical plant) do not

decrease when production declines due to inadequate supplies of raw materials, problems on the factory floor, or inefficient sales networks. Consequently, potential economies of scale are based on the physical and engineering characteristics of the production facilities—that is, on tangible capital—but realized economies of scale are operational and

organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital.

The importance of investing in intangible capital becomes obvious when one looks at what happens in

new capital-intensive manufacturing industries. Such

industries are quickly dominated, not by the first firms to acquire technologically sophisticated plants of

theoretically optimal size, but rather by the first to exploit the full potential of such plants. Once some firms achieve this, a market becomes extremely hard to enter. Challengers must construct comparable plants and do so after the first movers have already worked out problems with suppliers or with new production processes. Challengers must create

distribution networks and marketing systems in markets where first movers have all the contacts and

know-how. And challengers must recruit management teams to compete with those that have already mastered these functional and strategic activities.

In the context of the passage as a whole, the second paragraph serves primarily to


    A.provide an example to support the argument presented in the first paragraph


    B.evaluate various strategies discussed in the first paragraph


    C.introduce evidence that undermines the argument presented in the first paragraph


    D.anticipate possible objections to the argument presented in the first paragraph


    E.demonstrate the potential dangers of a commonly used strategy


登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

资深讲师题题有解析

{{current}} / {{duration}}

登录 申友雷哥GMAT,查看完整视频

文字解析

答案:
A

Evaluationp>

This question asks about the rhetorical function of the second paragraph. While the first paragraph argues that a crucial factor in achieving economies of scale is intangible capital, or organized human capabilities, the second paragraph uses the example of new capital-

intensive manufacturing industries to help show that this is indeed the case.

A.Correct. The second paragraph provides an example that illustrates the claims made in the first paragraph. It discusses the way in which intangible capital—e.g.,

distribution networks, marketing systems, smooth production processes, and qualified management teams—enables manufacturers in new capital-intensive manufacturing

industries to realize economies of scale and achieve market dominance.

B.The second paragraph does, in a sense, “evaluate” investment in intangible capital: it suggests that such investment is necessary. However, investment in intangible capital is the only strategy it discusses.

C.The second paragraph supports rather than undermines the first paragraph’s argument.

D.Nothing in the second paragraph suggests that there are, or could be, any objections to the first paragraph’s argument.

E.The second paragraph discusses the potential positive outcomes of investing in

intangible capital. It suggests that there might be negative consequences to not making such investments, but it does not indicate that avoiding such investments is a

commonly used strategy.


The correct answer is A.


GMAT会员

提交
OG视频
申友雷哥GMAT小助手

添加官方小助手微信
了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

100蜜糖购买当前课程

当前蜜糖数:颗 去获取

立即购买 取消购买

吉祥物小蜜蜂

关注公众号

公众号

扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

微信咨询

申友在线咨询二维码图片

扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282